Inverse Square Law Calculator

Intensity vs distance for point sources: I₂/I₁ = (d₁/d₂)². Forward and inverse modes. Free-space model.

Assumptions: point source, isotropic emission (uniform in all directions), no attenuation by the medium (vacuum or short-range air for high-energy gamma).

Does NOT apply to collimated beams, extended sources, or cases with shielding or scattering.

For radiation protection calculations with shielding, use specialized tools (linear attenuation, half-value layer HVL).

m
m

Formula

I₂ = I₁ × (d₁ / d₂)²

Why intensity falls with the square of distance

A point source radiates energy uniformly in all directions, creating a spherical wavefront. The total power emitted (P) is constant and spread over the surface of that sphere. The surface area of a sphere grows as the square of the radius: A = 4πr². Therefore, the intensity — power per unit area — at any distance r is I = P / (4πr²). Doubling the distance quadruples the area, so intensity drops to one quarter.

This gives the inverse-square law directly: I ∝ 1/r². Taking the ratio at two distances d₁ and d₂ eliminates the source power P and yields the dimensionless form used by this calculator: I₂/I₁ = (d₁/d₂)². The formula works for any intensive quantity that radiates isotropically from a point: radiation dose rate (mSv/h, mrem/h), light illuminance (lux), sound intensity (W/m²), gravitational field strength, or electrostatic field intensity.

The inverse formula solves for the required distance: d₂ = d₁ × √(I₁/I₂). This answers the question: how far must I be from this source to reduce the dose rate to my target value?

When the inverse-square law applies (and when it doesn't)

The law applies strictly when three conditions hold: (1) the source is a point — or can be approximated as one because the observation distance is much larger than the source dimensions; (2) emission is isotropic — the source radiates equally in all directions; (3) there is no significant attenuation by the medium — absorption and scattering are negligible between d₁ and d₂.

The law does NOT apply to: (a) collimated beams — a laser or a tightly focused X-ray beam does not spread spherically, so intensity can remain nearly constant with distance; (b) extended sources — a large gamma-emitting tank, a long pipe, or a surface source; the law underestimates dose near the source and overestimates it at great distance; (c) media with significant attenuation — water, concrete, lead, or dense air paths where scattering and absorption reduce intensity faster than the geometric 1/r² term.

For radiation, air attenuation is generally negligible for high-energy gamma (>1 MeV) at distances under ~10 m, making the law a reasonable first approximation in open air for such sources. For low-energy photons (X-rays, low-energy gamma) or distances over tens of metres, air attenuation becomes significant.

Practical use in radiation protection — and its limits

In radiation protection, the inverse-square law provides a quick estimate for the dose rate at a new distance when a measurement is already known at a reference distance. This is valuable for surveying sources and planning safe working distances under the ALARA principle (As Low As Reasonably Achievable). The calculation is fast, requires only two values (I₁ and d₁), and gives an order-of-magnitude result useful for initial planning.

However, for real shielding calculations, this tool is not sufficient. Shielding design requires the full attenuation equation: I₂ = I₁ × e^(−μx) / (d₂/d₁)², where μ is the linear attenuation coefficient of the shielding material. The half-value layer (HVL) concept lets you determine the thickness of a specific material (lead, concrete, water) needed to reduce intensity by half. Multiple HVLs give multiplicative reduction. Neither of these is handled by this calculator.

References: ICRP Publication 103 (2007); NCRP — National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; Cember H, Johnson TE — Introduction to Health Physics, 4th ed.; ACGIH TLV/BEI Booklet — Physical Agents — Ionizing Radiation. For regulatory compliance, always verify applicable dose limits with the relevant authority (Health Canada, NRC, IRSN, etc.).

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this the same as the noise distance attenuation tool?
They use the same underlying physics — the inverse-square law — but measure different quantities on different scales. The noise distance attenuation tool works in decibels (a logarithmic scale) because sound pressure is conventionally expressed in dB. This tool works with raw intensity ratios on a linear scale, which is appropriate for radiation dose rate (mSv/h), light illuminance (lux), or any linear quantity. For sound specifically: a 1/r² drop in intensity corresponds to −6 dB per doubling of distance, which is equivalent to I₂/I₁ = 0.25.
Does this work for radiation, light, and sound?
Yes — the formula I₂/I₁ = (d₁/d₂)² is universal for any isotropic point source in a non-attenuating medium. For radiation (gamma, X-ray): enter dose rate in µSv/h or mrem/h. For light: enter illuminance in lux or candela·m⁻². For sound: enter acoustic intensity in W/m² (not dB — for dB use the noise distance attenuation tool). For gravity or electrostatics: enter field intensity in the relevant unit. The math is identical in all cases.
What is a point source?
A point source is an idealized source that emits energy from a single point in space. In practice, a source qualifies as a point source when the observation distance is much greater than the source dimensions — typically at least 10× the largest dimension of the source. A small sealed radioactive source (e.g., a calibration check source of a few millimetres diameter) behaves as a point source at distances of 10 cm or more. A large gamma-emitting tank does not.
Why doesn't this apply at very short distances?
At very short distances, the observation point is often closer to the source than the source dimensions themselves — which violates the point-source assumption. In radiation work, measurements taken within a few centimetres of a source are unreliable for extrapolation using the inverse-square law because the geometry of the source matters. Additionally, near a radioactive source you may be within the near field of the radiation pattern, where field uniformity assumptions break down. Always use actual measurements at the relevant distance rather than extrapolating from a very close reference distance.

You might also need

See all tools →

Complementary tools based on what you're doing